top of page
Search

Dancing the Night Away: Regency Ballroom Dances

Publication Date: January 2, 2026


“To be fond of dancing was a certain step towards falling in love.”


painting by Henry Gillard Glindoni of a gentleman and line of ladies holding fans
Henry Gillard Glindoni, "Fan Flirtation," 1908, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

A Peek into Georgian and Regency-Era Balls: Dances, Etiquette, and Social Intrigue


In the flickering candlelight of a grand ballroom or the bustling warmth of a provincial assembly room, dancing during the Georgian (roughly 1714–1830) and Regency (long Regency being 1795–1837 and official Regency being 1811-1820) eras was far more than mere entertainment. It was a finely tuned social ritual with a blend of courtship, display, and subtle strategy where a misplaced step or lingering glance could spark romance or scandal (and ample fodder for our hist roms!).


Popularized in Jane Austen's novels and modern adaptations, balls and assemblies pulsed with unspoken codes, from the prestige of leading a set to the thrill of a whispered conversation during a pause. But behind the romance lay structure: intricate choreographies, strict etiquette, and an evolution of styles influenced by continental fashions and post-Napoleonic cultural exchanges.

 

Let's step through the key elements of this captivating world, from the dances themselves to the rules that governed every twirl.



 

The Evolution and Typical Line-Up of an Evening's Dances: An Overview

 

Ballroom programs followed a deliberate progression, blending tradition with emerging trends. The hostess (and/or Master of Ceremonies) set the specific dance order well in advance of the event, but the general line-up was standard across all balls and assemblies.

 

In the earlier Georgian period, evenings opened with the formal minuet, which was a holdover from courtly 18th-century balls that emphasized poise and hierarchy.

 

By the 1790s, however, the minuet began fading from general use, reserved mostly for ceremonial openings at elite events where nobility or royalty were present, and considering how many of our beloved hist roms feature a noble hero, that's something to consider. The minuet was still taught and performed into the 1810s and 1820s, but public assemblies increasingly skipped it in favor of livelier options.

 

The heart of most evenings was the country dance, which dominated from the Georgian era through the Regency.


These were performed in longways formations (lines of couples facing each other) and could include familiar tunes like "Mr. Beveridge’s Maggot" or "The Duke of Kent’s Waltz."


Enjoy this clip of "Mr. Beveridge's Maggot," as danced by Le danseurs de la Cie Chestnut, of which I'm sure you'll recognize both in music and choreography since it was featured in Pride and Prejudice's 1995 adaptation, Emma's 1997 adaptation, as well as a few other films:

 


Cotillions—square-set dances with intricate, repeatable figures—had been introduced from France around 1770 and remained popular alongside country dances, adding variety without overwhelming the lineup. There were many tunes to which a cotillion could be danced. Enjoy these two clips of the cotillion in action, the first is the "La Strasbourgoise Cotillion" from a Napoleonic Ball and the second "The Lady Nelson's Waltz Cotillion" from RegencyDances.org:


 



By the early 1800s, change accelerated.


The quadrille, a more structured evolution of the cotillion featuring five lively parts (like Le Pantalon and L'Été), arrived in England around 1815–1816, brought from Paris by influential figures like Lady Jersey. It quickly became a staple at fashionable private balls, especially after the Napoleonic Wars ended, allowing cultural imports to flourish. This clip from the Jane Austen Dancers showcases the quadrille, complete with dancing directions, but sadly, you'll have to click the link to watch it on YouTube, as the Jane Austen Dancers channel has prohibited embedding on websites: Here's the clip on YouTube!


The waltz, with its intimate closed hold and swirling turns, was more revolutionary: introduced around 1812 by continental visitors (possibly Baron Neumann or travelers from Vienna), it was initially deemed shocking and "foreign" due to the physical closeness it required. By 1815, it gained tentative acceptance at exclusive venues like Almack's Assembly Rooms in London, though conservative assemblies resisted it well into the 1820s. What began as scandalous evolved into a fashionable craze, symbolizing the era's shifting social liberties.



A Typical Lineup Varied By Venue


At public assembly rooms (which were modest, subscription-based gatherings in market towns, e.g., Almack's) the focus stayed conservative: starting with a country dance, followed by several more longways sets, perhaps a cotillion, and ending with a cheerful group finale like La Boulangère (a boisterous circle dance with clapping and simple steps) or Sir Roger de Coverley (a progressive longways dance from the late 18th century, often called the "finishing dance" for its merry energy). These events might feature 10–15 dances, emphasizing familiarity and inclusivity.

 

Private balls, hosted by wealthy families in grand homes, were grander and more experimental. A dance master (like the prolific Thomas Wilson, who taught, published manuals, and organized events) might be hired to lead, with professional musicians providing accompaniment on piano, violin, or small ensembles. Lineups could stretch to 20 dances: opening with a minuet if formality demanded, interspersing country dances with cotillions or quadrilles, slipping in waltzes for the bold, and closing with lively favorites. Supper often interrupted midway, around 1 a.m., with dancing resuming until dawn. The role of a Master of Ceremonies at public balls or the hostess at private ones was crucial: they regulated pairings, called dances, and ensured smooth flow, preventing chaos in crowded rooms.


As to the number of dances per evening, we’ll get a little more into this later, but country dances were often performed as a “set,” which meant two to three country dances performed back-to-back with the same partner, so while there might be a total of 10-15 individual dances through the night at an assembly or up to as many as 20 at a private ball, there may only be 6 or so sets total, so the chance to dance with 6 different partners (or fewer if you’re Jane Bennet and dancing the night away with Mr. Bingley!). This would be, typically, 4 sets before supper, and then 2 after. Some of the dances, like the Boulanger, were considered single dances and would never be paired with another dance.



At-A-Glance Line-Up


The dance openers:

  • Minuet begins the dance (1790s and before)

    • Opened all dances during the 18th century but faded out by 1790s unless royalty or nobility were present, then a minuet was expected

  • Mr. Beveridge’s Maggot begins the dance (1790s and after)


The bulk of the dance:

  • Country dances followed, typically the Longways Set, interspersed with:

    • Cotillons (popular 1790s-1800s)

    • Quadrilles (post-1815, after the Napoleonic wars)

    • Waltzes (post-1810, widespread by 1820)


The dance's grand finale:

  • Boulanger or Sir Roger de Coverley were the merry finale of the evening


Seeing Sir Roger de Coverley in action will tell you a lot about why it was a popular choice as a finale for the evening. This clip from the 1951 adaptation of A Christmas Carol is a perfect depiction:




Ball Timing & Dance Length


Balls could have as many as 20 dances during the evening, each lasting 10-30 minutes, depending on set size and set pairing, but the most common was 12 dances, some sets lasting a full hour, especially if there were several lines (line sets) and two or more groupings of dances (dance sets). Now, before you get too wide-eyed over 12 dances, many of these would be paired into sets, so a young lady may, technically, only be dancing 6 sets for the entire evening, or fewer, and since sets were with the same partner, that would mean only 6 dance partners, even if the total, individual dance count was 12. More on sets soon!


Regardless of the number of dances, when someone says they danced every dance, consider just how long they would have been dancing without a break!

 

Balls began in the evening, danced non-stop until a 1 a.m. supper break, and then continued until dawn.



Country Dances


These usually had between 10-30 couples, but those couples at the bottom of the set might be waiting 15-20 minutes before being able to dance.

 

Once the dancing began, there was no stopping until the dance ending.

 

When the set was long, a dance could easily last over an hour to ensure everyone in the set had an opportunity to dance.



Cotillions and Quadrilles


These had 4 couples in a square, but they required memorizing dance steps (“figures”), so not everyone could dance them. They didn’t require waiting, though, as more dancers could join in. They were excessively fashionable by 1815, and much shorter to dance since the music didn’t have to keep going until everyone in the set had a turn.


Now, when you think about dances needing memorization and steps being quite complicated, for the people of the era, dancing was a popular pastime. It would not have been uncommon for siblings and friends to practice at home together, showing each other the steps, or for those who had the money, hiring a dance master. While the steps certainly would have been memorized and rather complicated by our standards, they would not have been thought of as complex by those of the era, merely fun. That said, someone who has never danced before would not have been able to step onto the floor and join the dancers—no way, no how!



Characteristics of the Era's Signature Dances


Each dance had its own tempo, style, and social flavor, ranging from elegant restraint to flirtatious energy. Difficulty varied; most required lessons from a dancing master, as steps were intricate and memorized figures essential.


  • Minuet: Slow and stately in 3/4 time, this courtly dance highlighted grace, posture, and precise footwork like bows and turns. It was "high society" prestige (remember the ceremonial openings?) but faded as assemblies favored fun over formality. Socially safe, with minimal contact.

 

  • Country Dances: Lively and upbeat, often in 6/8 or 2/4 time, these longways sets could last 20–30 minutes (or over an hour with more couples). Familiar to all classes, they involved progressing down the line with figures like hands across or circling. Since everyone knew these dances, they were ideal for conversation during waits, but they carried flirtation potential through eye contact and brief touches.

 

  • Cotillion: In square formation for four couples, with moderate tempo and intricate figures (e.g., chains or balances). More structured than country dances, it required advance knowledge but offered variety. Popular in the 1790s–1800s, it bridged Georgian tradition and Regency innovation. Important to remember: to dance the cotillion, you had to know the choreography. Only those who were trained by a dance master, essentially, would be dancing the cotillion, never someone new or amateur to dancing.

 

  • Quadrille: Faster-paced and flirtatious, in squares with five parts blending steps from cotillions and other forms. Introduced post-1815, it was fashionable among the elite, shorter than country sets (only 10–15 minutes!), and easier to join without long waits, although memorization was key.

 

  • Waltz: Simple yet intimate in 3/4 time, made its entrance around 1810 but was too scandalous to be danced at assemblies. It shifted from flirtation risk to accepted romance by the 1820s. Not for conservative venues. For more details on the types of moves (no, they were not dancing our modern version with a hand on the shoulder and waist, spinning romantically) and types of waltzes (including by year), check out my deep dive on the waltz.

 

  • Closing Dances like La Boulangère or Sir Roger de Coverley: Boisterous and simple, these group dances ended nights on a high note with clapping, reeling, and communal fun, accessible to all without prestige pressures.

 

While the general line-up was expected across all balls and assemblies, there would be differences in the specific dances chosen and the order of interspersed country dances between public assembly rooms and private balls, with the assembly rooms choosing the simplest and most modest dances, while private balls enjoyed hostess choice, meaning it was not uncommon to see more complex figures and more scandalous dances, like the waltz.



Decoding the "Set": Formations, Waiting, and Social Hierarchy


The term "set" was multifaceted but central to the experience. We read "set" in just about every hist rom featuring a ball, but what does it mean?


Well, the term itself is easy enough to grasp, but the complication is that it has two different meanings depending on what’s being referenced.


Let’s look at the two definitions at a glance, and then we’ll break them down.


The word “set” could refer to either:

  • A paired slot of two dances with the same partner on the evening program

  • Or the physical line or group of dancers performing a figure


Consider these uses:

  • “We danced six sets before supper”

    • Here, set is used socially to refer to the number of paired dances, so twelve dances total, two each with the same partner

  • “Each country dance began with the top of the set dancing down the line”

    • Here, set is used technically to refer to the line formation of couples within one longways country dance


How many dancers and how large the room would determine, as well, how the sets (both meanings!) were experienced. For instance, if there was enough ballroom width to have both sets (lines of dancers) dancing simultaneously, and there were two paired dances, then the couples would be dancing both sets. But if the ballroom was on the small side and/or there were too many dancers, the second set of dancers would have to wait until the second set of dances, and the first set of dancers who enjoyed the first set of dances would need to make way for the second set. When the latter was the case, it was an opportunity for the couple to wait for their turn on the terrace or on the sidelines or in the refreshment room, offering more time to chat. To attend such a squeeze, though, was rare. It's a common occurrence in our hist roms but rare in reality.

 

Term Use

“Set” Refers to

Context

Formation

Group of couples line up to dance a specific figure

Dance manuals, floor layout

Program

A partnered unit of time, usually two dances with the same partner

Social usage, diaries, event programs, gossip columns


Set = A Pairing of Dances (the Evening Program definition)


This is the event planner’s or social usage of the term. In this context, a “set” means one full program slot, which is often composed of two country dances performed back-to-back with the same partner.


When you hear someone say they “danced six sets” in a night, that means they danced twelve dances, but those twelve were paired into groupings of two, each pairing danced with the same partner and danced non-stop from beginning to end. So, if someone says, “We danced a set together,” that means they danced the two assigned dances in that time slot with the same partner.


If there are four sets before supper, that translates to eight distinct choreographies total but only four dance partners.


The typical is to pair the country dances into sets, but it wasn’t unheard of to pair a cotillion with a country dance.


Valets and lady's maids were privy to the most intimate routines, from hair and clothing to illnesses and emotional breakdowns, but the rule was discretion at all costs. To repeat gossip, even in the servant's hall, was a punishable offense.



Set = A Line of Dancers (Formation definition)


When referring to the structure of the dance floor, a “set” is a group of couples lined up for a particular dance, usually in a longways formation.  This was specific only to longways and square dances, such as the country dances, the cotillion, and the quadrille.


To complicate matters, in country dances at a large ball with large ballrooms, two or more sets may run simultaneously because there would be so many dancers wanting to join in the fun.


This use of the term “set” would be a technical term used by a dance master or the Master of Ceremonies, such as instructing the guests to setup “longways for as many as will.”  


This usage of a group of dancers in a formation could be applied to both longways lines and squares:

  • longways lines for country dances (as few as 6-8 couples per set and as many as 10–30 pairs per set, spanning the length of the room)

  • or squares for cotillions and quadrilles (four couples per square).


line of gentlemen and ladies facing each other at a ball
Pride and Prejudice, 1995, Netherfield Ball

Take a moment to visualize your favorite Pride and Prejudice adaptation during the assembly, Elizabeth and Darcy facing each other. That line they're standing in, the couples facing each other? That's a "set."


In large halls, multiple sets might dance simultaneously to the same music, with "two sets" meaning the dance is so long that the line had to break into two waves, leaving those in the second wave waiting their turn as each couple in the first set had their own turn to dance before moving on to the second set's turn.

 

Position mattered immensely. The "top of the set" was prestigious, as the leading couple called the figures and danced first, visible to all as a sign of status or favor. Couples at the bottom? They waited... sometimes 15–20 minutes as the dance progressed downward through the set. This is when couples could talk during a dance, while they waited rather than while dancing. Once their turn came, they committed fully, because sets could last half an hour (so a full hour if there are two sets!), testing dancing endurance and poise.

 

There were typically 12 sets in a single evening. Dance cards were a Victorian invention, so no dance cards in the Georgian/Regency era! Promised dances were nothing more than verbal engagements as the dancers remembered which dance they had promised to whom. That said, it was not unheard of for ladies to jot down the dances and partners on the staves of their fan or keep a little notebook!


In short:

  • Being at the top of the set meant you danced first (lucky!)

  • Being at the bottom of the set meant you had to wait through half the music before getting a turn—but had all that time to chat with your partner (oh boy!). If there were two full sets due to length, it meant even more waiting since the first full set would have their turn before the second could dance, and heaven forbid you be at the bottom of that set! Lots of waiting!

 

Whoever led the set, meaning the very first couple to dance, was the top couple who showed what figures would be used for the dance—all dancers in the set would watch their moves to repeat the same. This was a great honor to be the top couple.

 

Now, if we consider the two different meanings of the word “set,” and then applied them to a sentence together, we might get something like this:


“I danced two full sets with Mr. Woodcrest and was at the top of the set in both!”

Lucky Mr. Woodcrest. Wink.



The Unwritten Rules: Etiquette on the Dance Floor


Regency dancing was a minefield of propriety, enforced by chaperones, hostesses, and societal expectations. Breaches could tarnish reputations.


  • Introductions and Pairing: Gentlemen needed a proper introduction (via hostess, mutual friend, or Master of Ceremonies) before asking a lady to dance. No one could introduce themselves, and someone they just met could not, then, introduce someone else. Introductions had to be made by already well known parties or the hostess or MC. Rachel Knowles offers this helpful guide on introductions at balls and events. Once invited, she couldn't decline the dance invitation unless already engaged for that dance or set of dances, otherwise, she would have to sit out entirely, signaling disinterest and/or snobbery.

 

  • Commitment: Standing up with a partner meant staying for the full dance or set, as there were no early exits unless ill; to do so would be a grave insult to both partner and host. Dancing twice with the same person hinted at serious interest, sparking gossip (but do keep in mind that if two people danced a set, as in two or more dances paired, this was considered "one" dance together, not two separate dances).

 

  • Conduct: Maintain posture, appropriate distance, and polite eye contact (but not too intense). Conversation was mandatory during pauses, as silence was awkward, but couples should stick to light topics like the weather or news. Couples must join the line's set from the bottom to avoid pushing.

 

  • Attire and Touch: Gloves were non-negotiable, always white or light-colored, always worn (except at supper—one never dined wearing gloves). No bare-handed contact; gentlemen escorted ladies post-dance to offer refreshments.

 

  • For Marrieds: Couples rarely danced together—it was unfashionable and deprived singles of opportunities. Gentlemen danced with unpartnered ladies; refusing (like Mr. Elton in Emma) was rude. While married couples could dance (with other partners, not each other), dancing was part of courtship for the singles, so to have someone already married taking up space in the set was considered rude to the singles who needed a chance to find a spouse. While marriage did not signify the end of one's dancing days, it would certainly cut back on the number of dances!

 

  • Conversation: Interestingly, conversation during dancing wasn’t as much of a thing as you might think. It would be proper to remark on the weather and like while waiting in the set, but once the dancing reached the couple, conversation typically ended. Similarly, only those well acquainted would converse in anything more than polite small talk during the wait.

 

  • Improvisation: Dancers never improvised or displayed flamboyant movements. The top couple chose the figures of the dance, and everyone followed exactly. Any alterations to the steps would be rude, insulting, and garner negative attraction.

 

  • Chalk: The dance floor would be chalked (never, ever, ever polished) so dancers would not slip when dancing. The chalking was actually a really fascinating aspect of the ballroom, both in design and function, so do please explore this absolutely wonderful article from Kathryn Kane of The Regency Redingote: “The Now Vanished Ephemeral Art: Chalking the Regency Ballroom Floor.”


These rules amplified social tensions: a dance was a "test" of compatibility, with chaperones watching for impropriety.



How Accurate Are Your Favorite Period Dramas?


Modern adaptations capture the spirit but often bend history for drama. Here's a quick comparison:


Pride & Prejudice (1995)

Accuracy: High

Authentic choreography matches real country dances; captures social tension and awkwardness beautifully. The dances are depicted a little more formally than they would have been for that time, essentially the children dancing how their parents would have danced more than what their generation would have danced, but still the most accurate of the other adaptations. For a touch more accuracy, a livelier country dance would have been included.

 

Emma (2020)

Accuracy: High

Playful and sharp, this film nails class dynamics and etiquette, though there were some artistic liberties taken.

 

Bridgerton (Series)

Accuracy: Dismally and Embarrassingly Low

This is stylish fantasy with anachronistic waltzes and quadrilles dominating an 1813 ballroom. These dances were far too early for the time, far too frequent, and even included modern hybrids like elements of the tango. In other words, pure fantasy with little to no accuracy.

 

Pride & Prejudice (2005)

Accuracy: Moderate

Visually dreamy, but the dances are more impressionistic and artistic than historical. That said, the country dances offer that lively element that the 1995 adaptation was missing.



Concluding Thoughts


Georgian and Regency dances were a mirror of society: elegant yet rigid, romantic yet strategic. A heroine's flushed cheeks mid-reel might signal budding love or simply the exhaustion of a 30+ minute set. Next time you watch a twirling couple on screen or read the heroine “standing up with a gentleman,” remember the layers beneath that dance: every step was a statement, every glance a gamble, and far more complex than a step to the left and a curtsy.

 

Shall we dance?



Resources for Regency Dancing Enthusiasts


A few sources to explore or try the dances yourself:







Enjoyed this research post? Consider fueling my research endeavors with a fresh brew:

clickable button that says buy me a coffee

bottom of page